Archive for February, 2010

Racist or a ridiculous jab from an embittered soul?

Posted by Jonathan Ross

You be the judge:

Limey

“Limey is an old American and Canadian slang nickname for the British, originally referring to British sailors. The term is believed to derive from lime-juicer, referring to the Royal Navy and Merchant Navy practice of supplying lime juice to British sailors to prevent scurvy. The benefits of citrus juice were well known at the time thanks to the acute observations of surgeon James Lind, who noticed that the cabbage-eating Dutch had fewer problems with scurvy. Limes were used over lemons because limes were more readily available from Britain’s own Caribbean colonies. The term is thought to have originated in the Caribbean in the 1880s. A false etymology is that it is a derivative of “Cor blimey” (“God blind me!”).”

Oh yeah, and one more thing…my Mother is a British citizen.

But then again, facts tend to be damned from an individual who has little else to lose (credibility being the first to go, spurring the domino effect of heartache and in this particular case, most likely indigestion).

Tags:

F’ing hilarious on two fronts

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Colbert brutalized Ujjal...and they both loved it.

Ujjal plays the straight man well and Colbert is excellent as usual.  Although, the Himalayas most definitely extend into India, so I am not sure what he was talking about.  I also liked the fact that Colbert was able to pronounce his name much better than many Canadian commentators, who regularly brutalize the delivery.

The second funny piece of the day comes from…OK, wait for it…the Georgia Straight’s Charlie Smith.  What a surprise.

Smith takes issue with the fact that the City of Vancouver website has a portion of it devoted to…again, wait for it…the Mayor.

Oh the horror.

And get this…he has a video promoting Vancouver as a Green Capital to the world.

I know…a disgrace of epic proportions.

I mean, it’s not like other cities have profiles of their Mayor on their websites.

That would be ridiculous.

Great reporting, as per usual Charlie.  Keep up the tough investigative journalism.

Quick hits

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Read the rest of this entry »

Negative media coverage won’t dampen Canada’s ambitions

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Canada's gold medals might make the rest of the world prone to criticism, but all of the bluster emerging internationally should be ignored entirely.

Typing the search term “Vancouver” into Google these days produces a flood of negative stories which are snowballing far more effectively than the efforts to maintain the white stuff atop a warm and damp Cypress Mountain.

I find it fascinating how the British press are writing a post-mortem on the Games within 2-3 days of the opening.  But then again, in typical Limey tabloid fashion, printing first, and thinking and apologizing later, is once again being employed in skewered coverage designed to set the bar as low as possible for the London 2012 games.

To connect the death of Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili to Canada’s “lust for glory” or to blame the difficulties caused by usually warm temperatures is absolutely ridiculous.

And accordingly, most reading such tripe will be able see through these arguments as a tower of cards, shattered with the most innocuous gust of wind – meaning any voice of reason.

Don’t get me wrong…I have always been weary of VANOC’s operations, their modus operandi, and quite frankly, their decision making in running these Games.  As an example, when the Mayor of Vancouver, one of the biggest Olympic boosters out there, starts to publicly campaign for the organization to free the flame, you know that the powers that be have been couped up for far to long in their Burnaby headquarters.

But our pride, which is showing through like no other time in our history, should not be halted for all the criticism in the world.

Read the rest of this entry »

Sat Mar 20, 2010

March 2010
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

FACT OF THE DAY

An article titled Vancouver Politics by Paul Tennant in The Vancouver Book (1976), describes the entry of TEAM onto the civic political scene in 1968. TEAM, wrote Tennant, “sought to be a moderate reform group appealing to persons of all political ideologies.”

On their left was COPE (the Committee of Progressive Electors), also formed in 1968, and on their right was the NPA (the Non-Partisan Association), which had been a power in city politics for nearly four decades, and which “held that the affairs of the city should be run by those with the necessary knowledge and experience, i.e., those with a professional-managerial background, in order to run the city in a business-like way.”

The reformers, on the other hand, “felt that civic decision-making should be open to the public, with leadership coming from a cross-section of the population, and rule going to the working class majority. This group was concerned about land use, they advocated city control, and preferred to structure politics around the neighborhood concept.”

Quote OF THE DAY

“It was very diverse, and we got together by word of mouth. There were professors, business people, labor, lawyers and from all across the city. It was a coalescing of people around the idea we should do something.” – former City Councillor Setty Pendakur on the formation Vancouver’s reform movement and its political manifestation – TEAM – came into being in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

Archive

Tags