City Manager Penny Ballem chose wisely when selecting the tool to make necessary cuts.
My first take on this is that 44 jobs being cut thus far is far better for City of Vancouver employees than the original 120. The fact that “opportunities for potential placements of impacted staff” was always a part of the equation is impressive, and this revised number is the result of such efforts.
As I detailed in an earlier post regarding the services review that was just completed at City Hall:
“Achieving efficiencies, rolling back expenditures and cutting staff are never an easy set of tasks for any organization. That being said, what has happened as a result of the shared services review was something that was years overdo, and previously lacking the political will and the institutional leadership to make it happen.“
One would think that the unions, having plenty of advance notice that the layoffs are coming, will be very pleased with this adjusted result. In spite of the rhetoric from CUPE’s Paul Faoro to his membership in an open letter written last month:
“City Council chose to ignore all of the citizens and organizations, including civic unions they heard from during their consultation,”
it is now clear that the opposite is true.
If cutting a bloated and often duplicated bureaucracy results in a mere 44 jobs losses out of 9,000 jobs within the City of Vancouver, I’d say that it represents an impressive result largely brought about by team effort and innovation.
Alright…enough of inside baseball.
