Deciphering the truth

Are stories of Vanouver Police officers running intimidation tactics on the homeless true?  Hard to tell to what extent, if at all.

policehomelessness

But details emerging from the mouths of tent dwellers about being pressured to leave the area don’t seem to be coming out of thin air (the part about being pushed up against vans and told to pick up their s–t and get out of town? Well that’s a different story).

I found this piece of the above-linked article very telling however:

“But, last week, city manager Penny Ballem said homeless people sleeping under the Georgia Viaduct will be evicted on Feb. 5 next year, or face arrest.

Security officials have warned of arrests if homeless people don’t vacate the area around B.C. Place, GM Place and the Dunsmuir and Georgia viaducts.

The Province inspected the Georgia viaduct area Tuesday, where only a single bed and a parked police vehicle were apparent.”

Even though there can be little doubt that this move comes directly as a result of the extreme security measures that will sweep over the zones containing official Olympic venues, it does open up the possibility that the VPD is getting the jump a little early, and not limiting their sense of duty to these specific areas.

Do I think that there is any official policy coming out of City Hall regarding this sweep?  Absolutely not.

But I do believe that the VPD sees the Downtown Eastisde, for example, as a direct threat to their reputation.

If over 1,000 people will have temporary shelter for the coming winter as stated by Councillor Kerry Jang, these kinds of sweeps should be directed towards getting the shelters to maximum capacity.

Secondly, maybe as the Metro articile references, there is a way to involve homeless people in the festivities more than hiding them away from public view.

Like I have stated in an early CivicScene posting:

“I believe that a mature city does all it can to put its best foot forward and makes genuine efforts to fix the ills that beset it, but the one thing it does not do is hide from its problems.”

Leave a Reply

Fri Mar 19, 2010

March 2010
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

FACT OF THE DAY

An article titled Vancouver Politics by Paul Tennant in The Vancouver Book (1976), describes the entry of TEAM onto the civic political scene in 1968. TEAM, wrote Tennant, “sought to be a moderate reform group appealing to persons of all political ideologies.”

On their left was COPE (the Committee of Progressive Electors), also formed in 1968, and on their right was the NPA (the Non-Partisan Association), which had been a power in city politics for nearly four decades, and which “held that the affairs of the city should be run by those with the necessary knowledge and experience, i.e., those with a professional-managerial background, in order to run the city in a business-like way.”

The reformers, on the other hand, “felt that civic decision-making should be open to the public, with leadership coming from a cross-section of the population, and rule going to the working class majority. This group was concerned about land use, they advocated city control, and preferred to structure politics around the neighborhood concept.”

Quote OF THE DAY

“It was very diverse, and we got together by word of mouth. There were professors, business people, labor, lawyers and from all across the city. It was a coalescing of people around the idea we should do something.” – former City Councillor Setty Pendakur on the formation Vancouver’s reform movement and its political manifestation – TEAM – came into being in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

Archive

Tags