Posts Tagged ‘Alex Tsakumis’

Documents prove that Ark Tsisserev signed off on safety concerns

Posted by Jonathan Ross

A telling set of documents regarding the Ark Tsisserev affair have been sent to CivicScene, challenging the trumped up claims of a group of political motivated individuals.

I have just received a very telling set of documents regarding the Ark Tsisserev issue, which has now taken on a level of political maneuvering and innuendo that doesn’t line up with the facts.

Alex Tsakumis writes in his post from yesterday morning that:

“…this whole matter began after I was leaked the email stream between Ark Tsisserev and his colleagues, from October, November and December of last year and then into early January–when he first raised concerns related to life safety issues with respect the the Olympic Village and then was concerned about inspection limitations for the pending Olympics.

He adds in a challenge regarding the safety sign-off by Tsisserev:

“If all Olympic venues were approved by city electrical inspectors in accordance with all recognized electrical and safety standards, release all the reports.”

In a post from February 9, Tsakumis also seems to suggest that Ark was fired as the whistleblower who was bringing forth safety concerns, and whom the city wanted to silence:

“An outstanding employee is fired after he spent the last two months of his tenure seeking answers to safety concerns about the Olympic Village that would be filled to the brim by unsuspecting Olympic athletes from all over the world not ten weeks from when Mr. Tsisserev discovered something might be wrong. In the midst of, presumably, seeking corrections, that exemplary employee is unceremoniously marched out of his office like a common thug, in front of his staff…”

I now have evidence in hand that proves otherwise.

Read the rest of this entry »

What was City Council told about Ark Tsisserev on January 21?

Posted by Jonathan Ross

City Council doesn't seem to be getting a full picture on a number of issues within City Hall.

Far be it from me to try and rival what Tsakumis is doing with this story, because his investigation over the past month and a half has been quite extensive.

For those unfamiliar with the issue, here is the Vancouver Courier’s Allen Garr and his account of the situation.

But in the vein of last week’s Vancouver Sun column, I am specifically interested in the January 21 in-camera City Council meeting that notified Council of Tsisserev’s departure and suggested Will Johnston, former Chief Building Official, as his replacement.

More specifically, I want to know what city staff conveyed to the electeds.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tsakumis’ Loose Facts, Part 2

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Tsakumis is at it again, with his rage over the success of Vision Vancouver seemingly running roughshod over the facts.

Here is part 1 for context, because like I said in this previous post, most times that I have the opportunity to read an Alex Tsakumis rant, I don’t stop laughing and shaking my head.

Never let the facts get in the way of a political axe that you have to grind.

This is Tsakumis’ take on Park Board Chair Aaron Jasper’s attendance at the Friends of Bloedel Rumble in the Jungle fundraising event.  He implies that Jasper arrived at the fundraiser and threw his weight around in demanding a discount.

What a load of crap.

Here is how it really went down.

Read the rest of this entry »

Michael Geller extends an invite

Posted by Jonathan Ross

After some contemplation, I will accept Michael Geller's offer to participate in his forum.

After some contemplation, I will accept Michael Geller's offer to participate in his forum.

After yesterday’s post on Michael Geller’s civic affairs forum slated for next Saturday, I received this response back from Mr. Geller (posted for those of you who don’t necessarily check the comments):

“Jonathan, I appreciate your kind words and agree with your concerns. A few clarifications. Joel Solomon was invited but cannot attend. We are still awaiting confirmation from a member of the Greenest City Task Force.

Only one of the CityCaucus.com bloggers is invited. I had been waiting to hear back from another person to provide an alternative perspective on the ‘pundits panel’, but not having heard back, I would like to formally, and publicly invite you to join the event as a member of the pundits panel.

Let me also publicly disagree with the suggestion that this will be a ‘bash Vision’ event. On the contrary, my message will be quite the opposite. Of the planning and development areas I propose to address, Olympic Village, Laneway Housing, Suites within Suites, Rental Housing initiatives, the Burrard Bridge Trial…these are all successes. I am both pleased and impressed with the accomplishments of the staff and council on these items.

(Although I do intend to share with the audience some interesting challenges with the Laneway Housing!)

I also plan to speak to the Metro Core jobs initiative which eliminated capacity for housing adjacent to the Central Business District. While I don’t agree with the decision of Council, this was not a left vs. right issue. On the contrary, my point will be how ironic it was that a left leaning council supported bigger head office buildings instead of mixed-use development. If your readers don’t know what I’m talking about, they should come to the event. I also plan to talk about the view and capacity study and other surprising council decisions.

Let me conclude with one of my father’s favourite sayings….”We usually judge people by what they say and do. But we expect others to judge us by our motives.”

My motives in initiating this event were quite simple. All my life, I have liked to celebrate birthdays and anniversaries. One year ago a very significant event happened in our city, and I thought it too should be celebrated. While I personally am disappointed that I did not win a seat on Council, I am not at all disappointed with the performance of this council. Indeed, a lot has been accomplished and I am quite proud of the direction the city is taking.

So I do hope you will accept this invitation to join Frances Bula and Monte Paulson and Mike or Daniel and yes, the irascible Alex Tsakumis. I also hope your readers will join us to hear James Fletcher share what Think City’s supporters think about the challenges surrounding the balancing of the budget, and John Tylee, Peter Ladner and others discussing the Green Capital plan.

I am personally looking forward to hearing what Gordon Price has to say and seeing the slides he’s bringing along.

So to recap. The event is free, although we will be passing the hat to partially cover the cost of coffee and muffins and room and microphone rentals. Doors open at 8. The program will start at 8:30 and end at 12:30. It takes place on the lower level of the SFU Wosk Centre for Dialogue which is at the corner of Seymour and Hastings. There will be plenty of time to hear questions and comments from the audience. And as you said, it will be a bash!

It was never my objective to garner an invite out my rant.  I legitimately thought that with the invite list that Geller had put together, the forum had the possibility of turning into a bash Vision event.

However, I believe Geller when he says that his message will be quite the opposite.  I also believe that he will run a well-balanced and fair event that is focussed on issues and discussion.

So, far be it from me to refuse to turn up to debate my favourite foil Alex Tsakumis in person.  Thus, I officially accept your offer, Mr. Geller.

I look forward to keeping things away from the gutter politics that some of your invitees so enjoy dwelling in.

Sat Mar 20, 2010

March 2010
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

FACT OF THE DAY

An article titled Vancouver Politics by Paul Tennant in The Vancouver Book (1976), describes the entry of TEAM onto the civic political scene in 1968. TEAM, wrote Tennant, “sought to be a moderate reform group appealing to persons of all political ideologies.”

On their left was COPE (the Committee of Progressive Electors), also formed in 1968, and on their right was the NPA (the Non-Partisan Association), which had been a power in city politics for nearly four decades, and which “held that the affairs of the city should be run by those with the necessary knowledge and experience, i.e., those with a professional-managerial background, in order to run the city in a business-like way.”

The reformers, on the other hand, “felt that civic decision-making should be open to the public, with leadership coming from a cross-section of the population, and rule going to the working class majority. This group was concerned about land use, they advocated city control, and preferred to structure politics around the neighborhood concept.”

Quote OF THE DAY

“It was very diverse, and we got together by word of mouth. There were professors, business people, labor, lawyers and from all across the city. It was a coalescing of people around the idea we should do something.” – former City Councillor Setty Pendakur on the formation Vancouver’s reform movement and its political manifestation – TEAM – came into being in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

Archive

Tags