Posts Tagged ‘Monte Paulson’

A Saturday morning full of civic affairs

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Civic affairs were front and centre in an interesting and engaging forum hosted this past Saturday.

Civic affairs were front and centre in an interesting and engaging forum hosted this past Saturday.

I really wasn’t sure what to expect when I walked into the “Year In Review” forum hosted by previous NPA candidate Michael Geller, largely because I suspected an overwhelmingly NPA supportive crowd would be the only ones to show up.

And, for the most part, I was correct – former and current NPA board members, elected officials and supporters roamed the room, with few Vision or COPE supporters in tow.  In fact, one of those former NPA elected officials tried to tell me that the morning remained civil and well-behaved because “the right-of-centre” had been behind the organizing, suggesting that had the “left” been at the helm, chaos and hostility would have ruled the day.

This is exactly the type of comment that I have come to expect from your typical NPA, Quadra-type of supporter.  When confronted with the question, I told the individual that having grown up in Marpole/Kerrisdale, I knew first hand that civility was by no means exclusive to her end of the political spectrum.

That bit of nonsense aside, I found the morning to be a fantastic endeavour that could prove to be a model for civic engagement for all parties – assuming, of course, that the pool of interest is widened with future sessions.

Read the rest of this entry »

Michael Geller extends an invite

Posted by Jonathan Ross

After some contemplation, I will accept Michael Geller's offer to participate in his forum.

After some contemplation, I will accept Michael Geller's offer to participate in his forum.

After yesterday’s post on Michael Geller’s civic affairs forum slated for next Saturday, I received this response back from Mr. Geller (posted for those of you who don’t necessarily check the comments):

“Jonathan, I appreciate your kind words and agree with your concerns. A few clarifications. Joel Solomon was invited but cannot attend. We are still awaiting confirmation from a member of the Greenest City Task Force.

Only one of the CityCaucus.com bloggers is invited. I had been waiting to hear back from another person to provide an alternative perspective on the ‘pundits panel’, but not having heard back, I would like to formally, and publicly invite you to join the event as a member of the pundits panel.

Let me also publicly disagree with the suggestion that this will be a ‘bash Vision’ event. On the contrary, my message will be quite the opposite. Of the planning and development areas I propose to address, Olympic Village, Laneway Housing, Suites within Suites, Rental Housing initiatives, the Burrard Bridge Trial…these are all successes. I am both pleased and impressed with the accomplishments of the staff and council on these items.

(Although I do intend to share with the audience some interesting challenges with the Laneway Housing!)

I also plan to speak to the Metro Core jobs initiative which eliminated capacity for housing adjacent to the Central Business District. While I don’t agree with the decision of Council, this was not a left vs. right issue. On the contrary, my point will be how ironic it was that a left leaning council supported bigger head office buildings instead of mixed-use development. If your readers don’t know what I’m talking about, they should come to the event. I also plan to talk about the view and capacity study and other surprising council decisions.

Let me conclude with one of my father’s favourite sayings….”We usually judge people by what they say and do. But we expect others to judge us by our motives.”

My motives in initiating this event were quite simple. All my life, I have liked to celebrate birthdays and anniversaries. One year ago a very significant event happened in our city, and I thought it too should be celebrated. While I personally am disappointed that I did not win a seat on Council, I am not at all disappointed with the performance of this council. Indeed, a lot has been accomplished and I am quite proud of the direction the city is taking.

So I do hope you will accept this invitation to join Frances Bula and Monte Paulson and Mike or Daniel and yes, the irascible Alex Tsakumis. I also hope your readers will join us to hear James Fletcher share what Think City’s supporters think about the challenges surrounding the balancing of the budget, and John Tylee, Peter Ladner and others discussing the Green Capital plan.

I am personally looking forward to hearing what Gordon Price has to say and seeing the slides he’s bringing along.

So to recap. The event is free, although we will be passing the hat to partially cover the cost of coffee and muffins and room and microphone rentals. Doors open at 8. The program will start at 8:30 and end at 12:30. It takes place on the lower level of the SFU Wosk Centre for Dialogue which is at the corner of Seymour and Hastings. There will be plenty of time to hear questions and comments from the audience. And as you said, it will be a bash!

It was never my objective to garner an invite out my rant.  I legitimately thought that with the invite list that Geller had put together, the forum had the possibility of turning into a bash Vision event.

However, I believe Geller when he says that his message will be quite the opposite.  I also believe that he will run a well-balanced and fair event that is focussed on issues and discussion.

So, far be it from me to refuse to turn up to debate my favourite foil Alex Tsakumis in person.  Thus, I officially accept your offer, Mr. Geller.

I look forward to keeping things away from the gutter politics that some of your invitees so enjoy dwelling in.

Geller’s “bash Vision” forum

Posted by Jonathan Ross

I have a lot of respect for Michael Geller dating back to his days with SFU’s UniverCity development and carrying through to the way he has carried himself in the municipal realm, pre- and post- election.

Michael Geller participating in a electoral debate with Councillor Geoff Meggs.  Too bad he didn't round out his panels this time around.

Michael Geller participating in a electoral debate with Councillor Geoff Meggs. Too bad he didn't round out his panels this time around.

However, I am going to call him out on the following forum that he is promoting at the SVU Wosk Centre for Dialog on November 14, 2009.

Geller buffers potential criticism for his invitee list with the following:

“While some of the participants have past ties to the NPA, it is proposed that this not be a highly charged event,” says the email dispatch from Geller. “Rather, the intention is to take a look at what has been happening and engage in substantive discussions on key issues to hopefully identify strategies and actions for the coming year.”

Although, as recognized by the boys over at City Caucus:

Editor’s note: All have had past ties to the NPA, but we take Michael’s point. This is not about the moribund civic party per se.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Wed May 23, 2012

May 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31  

FACT OF THE DAY

In 2010, Vancouver had fewer than half the number of murders than it had in 2009.  There were nine homicides within Vancouver’s city limits, down from 19 killings the previous year.

Quote OF THE DAY

“Perhaps it was my silk dress or the new perfume I’ve been wearing lately. When I asked Suzanne Anton what her New Year’s resolution was, she replied, “To kiss a pretty girl!” and pecked me on the cheek.”  – Writer Emily Barca describing her encounter with the lone NPA City Councillor on New Year’s Eve.

Archive

Tags