Posts Tagged ‘UFC’

And the results of the vote are….MMA coming to Vancouver for a 2-year trial

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Louie Against (suggested several amendments relating to indemnity and insurance which were cleared up by a sweeping single sentence amendment by Deal, very concerned about liability issues and protecting the city’s interests, we don’t have enough protection, Moore’s statements do not work against the law as it is currently written, from a legal standpoint it doesn’t work, making the liability issue that much more of a concern, moral component about what we as a city are promoting, and as it stands right now, complete desensitization of violence to children)

Reimer Against (smaller promoters boxed out, Canadian Criminal code, inherent violence in marketing)

Woodsworth Against (not enough time with staff report released yesterday particularly because federal and provincial legislation is on the way, police costs, concussion risk, gang concerns, too many serious questions unanswered)

Jang For (sport has evolved, not all about violence, positive values can be taught to kids)

Deal For (about time to move forward, report answers all possible questions)

Chow For (balances interests of citizens with practicality, and comfortable with trial basis)

Anton For (looks forward to attending the event, staff report was very informative, an in relation to Louie’s amendments, let the legal department do their jobs – Council should not get involved in setting indemnity and insurance dollar thresholds)

Stevenson (finally arrived) For (was at Metro Vancouver meeting, report is thorough and he has thought about the issue for a while, previously ambivalent but now supportive, safety concerns now have been cleared up for him, don’t impose morals on people – this is about proper regulation)

Meggs For (pros should contribute more cash to amateur sports)

The motion passes 6-3. MMA is back in Vancouver for at least two years.

Dave Teixeira from ECCW

Posted by Jonathan Ross

The voice of the local pro wrestling community Dave Teixeira is up. References community charter that gives municipalities the right to regulate comabt sports. Should be happy about that power. Quotes the injury stats – more deaths in badminton. more serious injuries in cheerleading. Shares with Council his love for cheerleaders however. Makes the correction that in terms of economic IMPACT (makes the distinction from the staff report), it would be about $20 million. Jang asks about copycat cases in the public with wrestling and MMA. Dave talks about protecting the fanbase and their safety. But you need to weed out those that are going to do what they are going to do in terms of mimicry. Meggs asking if wrestling is going up or down? Dave says wrestling in down about 20 per cent so far, directly as a result of the UFC phenomenon. Eating pro wrestling’s lunch, and now UFC is exploding because of masterful promotion. Dave makes good point about bad apples in politics just as there are bad apples in the world of MMA, and so don’t quote individual injuries on isolation.

Sensationalism?

Posted by Jonathan Ross

This latest speaker is ridiculous – says MMA is only sensational violence that is only about the bottom line. It represents toxic values – keep Vancouver UFC free like it is nuclear free. Jang asks this aikido dojo sensei about the violence of other martial arts. Jang says parents should be involved. Yes, but kickboxing and MMA studios cannot get insurance. Are you against karate? No, as long as it is properly administered. So Jang asks, if there is regulation, what is your issue? Intent and intention (aikido is all passive and defensive without competition). MMA is about punishment, and karate and other martial arts are not about violence. Woodsworth is now beaming because she finally found someone to agree with her. Best submission and best knockout purses are questioned. Speaker says it is all about money, and questions statistics from universities like John Tomkins down south who have quantified the low injury rates of MMA. He is speaking out of his ass quite frankly.

More speakers…Minister James Moore goes on the record to gush over UFC

Posted by Jonathan Ross

Meggs asks about betting and how they protect from fixed fights. Epstein answers that his bosses are in the casino business and are held to the highest legal standards. Meggs asks about amateur sport and financial support. Epstein says they are a very charitable organization, but they don’t get too involved in amateur sports because they don’t want to compromise other. Chow asks about moral standards and UFC’s arguments on fighting. Epstein says that regulation is where they started With the owners of Zuffa being from the gaming business. Morals and ethics are high with their athletes, and they are highly educated. Martial arts backgrounds are based on respect, honour and sportsmanship. Harvey Jones is the next speaker, VP for Northwest Sports (GM Place, CanucksM etc.). They like UFC. They think they are professional. He talks about the economic impact – 500 pary time staff, restaurants,hotels, etc. Many spectators come from outside of the province (up to one quarter. Indemnity is for EVERY event at GM Place…standard fare. We need to act now. Jang question: Canucks game, how different from UFC? Must look at security, alcohol management, crowd composition. Typical insurance for GM Place is $5 million. Louie question: insurance 5 million? That is what GM Place requires from promoter, but they have much more. What is insurer’s rating? Not sure. You use waivers for indemnity? Yes. Minister James Moore here to speak. Minister says federal government is entirely supportive of motion, sanctioning and hosting the event. This UFC event will be another in a 2010 full of global events coming to Vancouver. Moore went to one of the Montreal UFC events and says that all global city hosts have been through this kind of process. But Moore is absolutely gushing about what an opportunity this is. Gives a shoutout to GSP, a Canadian who he says is the biggest star in the world’s fastest growing sport. Moore says there is ABSOLUTELY no legal obstacles from the federal POV. Says pass the motion. Woodsworth asks who invited him. Moore says he invited himself. Woodsworth asks why Bill C-31 delayed. As usual blames it on the opposition. What is their opposition? Moore says ask them, but it has nothing to do with MMA. Deal says thank you for being here. Are you jealous there is no arena big enough in Port Moody? Anton awkwardly tells Moore to come again. Asks is they will woerk with City officials on this issue? Absolutely…cross-jurisdictional and so entirely appropriate. Reimer…Moore said that constituents overwhelmingly support. Reimer asks for polling data. Canada UFC’s biggest market per capita. Compared to arijuana use and Reimer jokingly asks whether they will move forward on that file. Reimer asks about the feds not proceeding on criminal prosecution in Montreal. Moore said feds don’t get involved in RCMP matters. Moore sits down after beating the MMA booster drum the loudest thus far.

Fri Mar 19, 2010

March 2010
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

FACT OF THE DAY

An article titled Vancouver Politics by Paul Tennant in The Vancouver Book (1976), describes the entry of TEAM onto the civic political scene in 1968. TEAM, wrote Tennant, “sought to be a moderate reform group appealing to persons of all political ideologies.”

On their left was COPE (the Committee of Progressive Electors), also formed in 1968, and on their right was the NPA (the Non-Partisan Association), which had been a power in city politics for nearly four decades, and which “held that the affairs of the city should be run by those with the necessary knowledge and experience, i.e., those with a professional-managerial background, in order to run the city in a business-like way.”

The reformers, on the other hand, “felt that civic decision-making should be open to the public, with leadership coming from a cross-section of the population, and rule going to the working class majority. This group was concerned about land use, they advocated city control, and preferred to structure politics around the neighborhood concept.”

Quote OF THE DAY

“It was very diverse, and we got together by word of mouth. There were professors, business people, labor, lawyers and from all across the city. It was a coalescing of people around the idea we should do something.” – former City Councillor Setty Pendakur on the formation Vancouver’s reform movement and its political manifestation – TEAM – came into being in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

Archive

Tags